|
|||||||
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|||||||
or against Palestine since 1947-2006
Your regime(Canada) is supporting War Criminal Israeli Zionist' regime or best of all she is Zionist's puppet!
UN Resolution 181
Palestine partition plan as approved by the United Nations 128th plenary session Nov. 29, 1947
(The resolution was approved by the general assembly, 33 votes in favor, 13 votes against, with 10 abstentions. The vote was as follows: voting for approval: Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, Brazil, Byelorussian soviet socialist republic, Canada, Costa Rica, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Dominican republic, Ecuador, France, Guatemala, Haiti, Iceland, library, Luxembourg, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Poland, Sweden, Ukrainian soviet socialist republic, union of south Africa, union of soviet socialist republics, United States of America, Uruguay, Venezuela.
Abstaining from the vote: Argentina, Chile, china, Columbia, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Honduras, Mexico, united kingdom, Yugoslavia.United nations general assembly resolution 3379 declaring "that zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination was passed at the 2400 Plenary Meeting on November 10, 1975. In favour: Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brazil, Bulgaria, Burundi, Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republic, Cambodia, Cape Verde, Chad, China, Congo, Cuba, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, Dahomey, Democratic Yemen, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Gambia, German Democratic Republic, Grenada, Guinea, Guinea-Bissau, Guyana, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Laos, Lebanon, Libyan Arab Republic, Madagascar, Malaysia, Maldives, Mali, Malta, Mauritania, Mexico, Mongolia, Morocco, Mozambique, Niger, Nigeria, Oman, Pakistan, Poland, Portugal, Qatar, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Somalia, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Syrian Arab Republic, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic, Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, United Arab Emirates, United Republic of Cameroon, United Republic of Tanzania, Yemen, Yugoslavia.
++++++++++++++++++
Against: Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Canada, Central African Republic, Costa Rica, Denmark, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Fiji, Finland, France, Germany (Federal Republic of), Haiti, Honduras, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Ivory Coast, Liberia, Luxembourg, Malawi, Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Swaziland, Sweden, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, United States of America, Uruguay. Abstaining: Argentina, Bhutan, Bolivia, Botswana, Burma, Chile, Columbia, Ecuador, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Greece, Guatemala, Jamaica, Japan, Kenya, Lesotho, Mauritius, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Philippines, Sierra Leone, Singapore, Thailand, Togo, Trinidad and Tobago, Upper Volta, Venezuela, Zaire, Zambia. The draft resolution was adopted by 72 votes to 35, with 32 abstentions [resolution 3379 (XXX)].
Canada was among the first nations to recognize Israel. From that day to this, Canada's policy has always been that Israel is entitled to live in peace
the convention was enshrined into international law, have the nations of the world convened to consider the application of convention rules. That was on July 15, 1999, also in Geneva, also to upbraid and isolate Israel. But that meeting lasted only 17 minutes and then it was adjourned. And Canada boycotted it.
March 7, 2002 Canadian Jewish groups that monitor Canada's voting record on Israel at the United Nations say the Liberal government's support for the Jewish state has long been patchy
One of the Liberal Party's own MPs -- Irwin Cotler -- was outraged by the vote. "This resolution is one-sided, prejudicial to the state of Israel and misinformed," Mr. Cotler, a human rights lawyer who represents the Montreal riding of Mount Royal, said at the time. With a federal election approaching, Jean ChrŽtien, the Prime Minister, personally wrote to Canadian Jewish leaders expressing "regret" for the "distress and frustration" the resolution had caused. "One UN vote cannot define or redefine the deep and longstanding friendship that exists between Canada and Israel," he said. But almost simultaneously, Canadian delegates at the UN were following Ottawa directives to quietly approve a batch of annually recurring measures slamming Israel.
This is a view of the U.N. General Assembly which condemned attacks against Palestinian civilians Monday night, August 5, 2002 at U.N. headquarters and demanded an immediate end to Israeli incursions in the West Bank and all acts of violence, incitement and destruction. The resolution, which is not legally binding, was approved 114-4 with 11 abstentions (as seen on board in background) at the end of a day-long debate in which Israel's occupation _ and recent reoccupation _ of West Bank cities was denounced by many countries in Asia, Africa and the Mideast.
Abstaining: Australia, Bulgaria, Canada, Honduras, Nauru, Nicaragua, Nigeria, Romania, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga.•by Israel since 1967; Calls upon all parties to continue, in the interests of peace and security, their negotiations...; Requests the Secretary General to bring to the attention of the Government of Israel the provisions of this resolution." The entire purpose of this resolution was to discredit Israel's reliability as a peace partner, to paint it as actually a threat to peace and to undermine Israel's claim to an undivided Jerusalem. And yet, Canada chose to support it. After the vote, undoubtedly somewhat self-conscious at the terrible coincidence of the vote and the Naharayim massacre, Canada officially explained its vote in the following text: "Canada is deeply saddened and shocked by the attack against innocent Israeli school children today in Jordan and we too extend our condolences to their families. Such deplorable acts of violence must not be allowed to derail the peace process
The General Assembly met this morning to conclude its consideration of the question of Palestine and the situation in the Middle East. (For further background information, see Press Releases GA/10109 of 29 November and GA/10110 of 2 December 2002). It was also expected to take action on a number of draft resolutions.
Finally, the Assembly adopted, by a recorded vote of 109 in favour to
4 against (Israel, Marshall Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, United States) with 57 abstentions, the draft resolution on the Syrian Golan (document A/57/L.45).with 57 abstentions,
Abstaining: Albania, Andorra, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Monaco, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Republic of Moldova, Romania, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Slovakia, Slovenia, Solomon Islands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Tonga, Tuvalu, United Kingdom, Uzbekistan, Vanuatu, Yugoslavia.
+++++++++++++++++++++++
Washington Report, January/February 2006, pages 28-29United Nations Report
Australia, Canada Join U.S. and Puppet Reefs in Backing Israel-centric Agenda
By Ian Williams
An UNRWA official shows EU Commissioner Louis Michel (c) homes in the Gaza Strip’s Rafah refugee camp destroyed by the Israeli military. In Gaza City earlier that day, Nov. 30, Michel signed an agreement with UNRWA pledging 14 million euros to help the U.N. relief agency provide food, shelter and other emergency assistance to Palestinian refugees (AFP photo/Said Khatib).
AS THE end of the U.N.’s 60th anniversary loomed, it was déjà vu all over again in New York. After a few years in which the United States had broken with recent tradition and actually paid its dues, things were back to normal, with threats of withholding from John Bolton and his soul-mate, Rep. Henry Hyde (R-IL)-who does such good imitations of his alter ego, Dr. Jekyll.And underlying everything-again-was the issue of the Palestinians. The original excuse for holding off payments was Washington’s refusal to fund the U.N.’s Palestinian programs, and now it is prominent on the agenda again. Looming in the congressional backwoods is the attempt to defund UNRWA, now that it has done its job of paying the welfare and education costs that, under the Geneva Convention, Israel should have borne when it was occupying Gaza, instead of turning it into a self-governing prison camp.
It is a measure of how battered the world community is that someone with as much blood on his hands as Ariel Sharon, with more forks in his tongue than a banquet table setting, should get so much international support. It was one thing for the few coral atolls paid for by the Congress to back the U.S. and Israel on General Assembly resolutions, but recent resolutions on the Palestinian programs revealed that Australia and Canada have been suborned into voting with Israel, while the European Union and associated states-a very significant bloc-abstains,